Environmental & water analysis 14 min read

PFAS analysis: expanding laboratory capacity with lab containers

The PFAS limit in the German Drinking Water Ordinance has applied since 12 January 2026, and the second stage follows on 12 January 2028. What a laboratory needs for trace analysis at nanogram level, and how additional measurement capacity can be created before the next deadline.

8 October 2026 Thomas Boss, Technical Director, Planexus
Home Magazine PFAS analysis

Since early 2026, PFAS, the so-called forever chemicals, have stopped being a research topic and become routine. Every water supplier in Germany must comply with the new limit for the Sum of PFAS-20 and demonstrate compliance. That evidence comes from laboratories able to quantify individual substances reliably at around 1.5 nanograms per litre. According to the German accreditation body DAkkS, around 50 testing laboratories were accredited for this PFAS analysis under the Drinking Water Ordinance in January 2026.

This article is written for laboratory managers at water suppliers, environmental laboratories and public testing agencies who need more measurement capacity. It explains the legal requirements in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. It shows why a PFAS laboratory places different demands on rooms and building services than a conventional water lab. And it describes how a lab container meets those demands.

PFAS analysis in a lab container: LC-MS/MS system with UHPLC and solvent bottles, sample vials in racks and laboratory workstations in a modular lab
Illustrative image: LC-MS/MS workstation in a lab container. Trace analysis needs a stable room climate, a clean power supply and well-planned service routing.

PFAS limits in drinking water: what applies since 2026

The 2023 Drinking Water Ordinance (TrinkwV) transposes the EU Drinking Water Directive (EU) 2020/2184 into German law. It introduces PFAS as a parameter in two stages. Both values are set out in Annex 2 of the TrinkwV:

Parameter Limit Applies from Substances
Sum of PFAS-20 0.1 µg/l (100 ng/l) 12 January 2026 10 perfluorocarboxylic acids (PFBA to PFTrDA) and 10 perfluorosulfonic acids (PFBS to PFTrDS)
Sum of PFAS-4 0.02 µg/l (20 ng/l) 12 January 2028 PFOA, PFNA, PFHxS, PFOS

Only substances that have been detected and quantified count towards the sums. Values below the limit of quantification are excluded. The concentrations of the individual substances must still be reported separately. That has a direct consequence for the laboratory: a higher limit of quantification produces lower reported sums. This is why the ordinance specifies how sensitive the measurement must be.

Method requirements under Annex 7

Annex 7 of the TrinkwV sets the performance characteristics. For PFAS this means:

  • The limit of quantification must not exceed 30 per cent of the parametric value.
  • For the sum parameters this is applied to the individual substances. Each must be quantifiable down to 1.5 ng/l, for both PFAS-20 and PFAS-4.
  • The permitted measurement uncertainty (k = 2) is 50 per cent of the parametric value.
  • The method must reliably measure concentrations at the parametric value with this uncertainty.

Only approved testing bodies may carry out the analysis. Under section 40 TrinkwV the federal states publish lists of these bodies and their parameter scope. According to DAkkS, the prerequisite is accreditation as a testing laboratory to DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025.

Key point

1.5 ng/l per substance means 1.5 billionths of a gram in one litre of water. At this level the quality of results is decided not only by the instrument but by the whole laboratory: materials, room climate, workflows and blank values.

Austria and Switzerland: status of PFAS rules

Austria added the parameter through an amendment to its Drinking Water Ordinance in February 2024. Since 12 January 2026 a parametric value of 0.10 µg/l for the sum of 20 PFAS applies there too. According to the state of Upper Austria, supplies delivering more than 100 m³ per day must include PFAS in their annual full analysis from 2026. Smaller supplies of 10 to 100 m³ per day have until 2032. An Austrian PFAS-4 stage for drinking water could not be confirmed at the time of writing.

In Switzerland, the TBDV ordinance currently regulates three PFAS individually: PFOS and PFHxS at 0.3 µg/l each, PFOA at 0.5 µg/l. On 27 May 2026 the Federal Council opened a consultation that proposes, among other things, a maximum of 0.1 µg/l for the sum of 20 PFAS. The consultation closed on 18 September 2026. No date of entry into force had been set at the time of writing. For laboratories in Switzerland this means measurement requirements are likely to move towards the EU level.

Why demand for PFAS laboratories is rising

Three developments coincide. First, PFAS is now a mandatory parameter for every water supplier, not just suspected cases. Second, PFAS-4 arrives in 2028 with a limit five times lower than PFAS-20. Suppliers with values close to that threshold will monitor more closely and track treatment measures with their own measurement series. Third, demand is growing beyond drinking water: groundwater, contaminated sites, soils, wastewater and food are all being tested for PFAS.

German broadcaster ZDF reported in early 2026 that an approved drinking water laboratory had been working at full stretch for months. Reliable nationwide figures on waiting times do not exist. One thing is clear, though: an additional LC-MS/MS system can be ordered, but a suitable room for it is often the bottleneck. Converting an existing laboratory while it keeps measuring samples is difficult. Options during a refurbishment are covered in our article on the temporary lab in rental containers.

How a PFAS lab differs from a conventional water lab

The methods are standardised. DIN 38407-42 (2011 edition) covers selected PFAS in drinking, ground and surface water as well as treated wastewater. Samples are enriched by solid-phase extraction (SPE) and measured by HPLC-MS/MS. DIN EN 17892:2024 deals specifically with PFAS in drinking water by LC-MS/MS and allows both direct injection and SPE.

The real challenge is stated in the standard itself: how low the limit of quantification actually is depends on the blank values a laboratory achieves. PFAS are present not only in the sample but also in the laboratory.

Typical PFAS sources in the laboratory

  • LC system: PTFE solvent lines, degassers and pump parts can release PFAS. Instrument manufacturers recommend PEEK lines and polypropylene bottle caps.
  • Delay column: a delay column between mixer and injector retains PFAS from the system. They then elute later than the PFAS from the sample and do not interfere with the evaluation.
  • Vials and closures: PTFE-lined septa are unsuitable for PFAS analysis. Polypropylene or polyethylene vials and caps are the norm.
  • Sample preparation: SPE cartridges, solvents and tubing must be checked for PFAS background. Long-chain PFAS also adsorb onto surfaces, causing losses.
  • Room and fit-out: fluoropolymers are also found in seals, coatings and equipment. When planning a trace laboratory, every material in the working area should therefore be reviewed.

Carry-over adds to this. Calibration standards are far more concentrated than the samples. Preparing standards and samples at the same bench risks cross-contamination. Good practice is therefore to separate high-concentration and low-concentration work physically. That separation is easier to build into the floor plan than to enforce later through organisation.

Room schedule for a PFAS lab in a container

PFAS workflows are well established. They translate into a room schedule that maps neatly onto modules. How many modules a project needs depends on sample throughput and the number of instruments.

Area Function Design focus
Sample reception Receipt, registration, cold storage Refrigeration capacity, short routes, LIMS connection
Sample preparation SPE, evaporation under nitrogen, reconstitution in solvent Fume cupboard, solvent handling, nitrogen supply
Standards preparation Preparing calibration and internal standards Separate from trace sample preparation
Instrument room LC-MS/MS systems Temperature stability, heat load, power, roughing-pump exhaust
Plant Nitrogen generator, compressor, ultrapure water, UPS Keep noise and heat out of the instrument room
Data evaluation Data processing, release, reporting Display-screen workstations, network, data backup

Evaporating extracts under nitrogen and handling methanol belong in a fume cupboard to DIN EN 14175. For fitting out the other areas, see our equipment checklist.

LC-MS/MS in a lab container: the technical requirements

Triple quadrupole mass spectrometers place clear demands on their location. Manufacturers summarise them in site preparation documents. The values below come from such documents for LC/MS triple quadrupole systems. They indicate the order of magnitude. The current document for your specific model always takes precedence.

Requirement Example values from manufacturer documents Implementation in the container
Room temperature Operation 15–35 °C, constant within ±3 °C of the calibration temperature Cooling sized for instrument heat, insulated envelope, monitoring
Rate of change Older LC/MS documents: no more than 2–3 °C per hour Supply air routed so it does not blow directly onto instruments
Heat output Below 4,500 BTU/h per system, roughly 1.3 kW. A nitrogen generator can add up to about 2.8 kW. Cooling load calculated from the equipment list, generator ideally in a separate plant room
Nitrogen Depending on model up to 30 or 50 l/min, 5.5–6.8 bar, hydrocarbon-free Generator or liquid nitrogen, pipe routing, check need for oxygen-depletion alarm
Power 200–240 V, dedicated outlets per system, voltage tolerance +10 / −5 %, noise-free earth Dedicated circuits, UPS for measurement and data acquisition
Extract Ion source and roughing-pump exhaust ducted outside Connected local extract, included in the ventilation balance

The most important factor in a container is the heat balance. Several instruments, HPLC pumps, computers and possibly a nitrogen generator share a small footprint, and summer outdoor temperatures add to the load. How we reconcile cooling load, air change rates and standards in a container is described in our article on HVAC in lab containers. Temperature, instrument status and nitrogen pressure can also be monitored remotely, as explained in the article on LIMS, IoT and remote monitoring.

Materials chosen at the factory

When converting an existing building you inherit the materials already there. With a lab container they are specified before construction starts. For a PFAS lab it is worth keeping a materials list for the working area as part of the specialist design: seals, tubing, furniture and surface coatings, fittings and the ultrapure water pipework. Where fluoropolymers are technically necessary, for instance for chemical resistance, that is a deliberate, documented decision.

Why a lab container makes sense for PFAS capacity

Time

Factory manufacture typically takes 8 to 14 weeks, in parallel with permits and foundations. Ongoing laboratory work is not disrupted by a building site inside the premises.

Controlled environment

New envelope, new ventilation, specified materials. For a trace laboratory that is a better starting point than a converted older building.

Next to the existing lab

The container stands right beside the existing laboratory. Sample logistics, staff and LIMS remain shared.

Rent or buy

Renting suits a bridge until a new building is ready. For a permanent extension, buying pays off.

For mobile deployments, such as measurement campaigns at waterworks or contaminated sites, a compact transportable system like the LABtoGO is a good fit. How mobile labs work on site is also shown in our article on materials testing on construction sites. If you plan laboratories for authorities and public testing agencies, see our page on public health and emergency preparedness.

Accreditation remains the laboratory's responsibility

A lab container provides the spatial and technical conditions. It does not confer accreditation. The laboratory must agree a new measurement room or site with its accreditation body and reflect it in its quality management system. That includes the room description, environmental monitoring, instrument qualification and method validation at the new location. Build this step into the programme from the outset. Clean technical documentation of the container makes it considerably easier.

Programme: counting back from 12 January 2028

If you want additional capacity ready for the PFAS-4 deadline, count backwards. The phases below are typical. Actual durations depend on permits, instrument lead times and the accreditation body.

  1. 1. Requirements and room schedule: sample volumes, number of instruments, equipment list with heat output and services.
  2. 2. Site and permits: location, foundation, service connections, planning law. Background in our articles on permits and installation and structural design.
  3. 3. Specialist design and procurement: ventilation, cooling, power, gases, materials list. What belongs in the documents is covered in the article on tendering with a requirements specification.
  4. 4. Factory manufacture: typically 8 to 14 weeks, with foundation and connections prepared on site in parallel.
  5. 5. Installation and commissioning: assembly, service connections, measurement of room conditions.
  6. 6. Instruments, validation, accreditation: LC-MS/MS installation, blank checks, method validation, coordination with the accreditation body.

Experience shows that delays rarely arise in the factory but from open questions at the start. The most common causes are described in our article on five planning mistakes. As of October 2026 that means: if you want to be measuring by early 2028, start step 1 now.

Checklist: planning a PFAS lab in a container

  • → Estimate sample volumes today and after 2028
  • → Choose the method: DIN 38407-42 or DIN EN 17892, direct injection or SPE
  • → Obtain site preparation documents for the planned LC-MS/MS systems
  • → Compile the heat load of all equipment, including the nitrogen generator
  • → Provide separate areas for standards and trace samples
  • → Keep a materials list for the working area with fluoropolymers in mind
  • → Settle nitrogen, ultrapure water and power supply, including UPS
  • → Plan environmental monitoring (temperature, humidity) with data logging
  • → Inform the accreditation body early about the new measurement room
  • → Decide between renting and buying based on the period of use

Conclusion

PFAS analysis of drinking water has been mandatory since 2026 and becomes more demanding in 2028. Measurements are made at 1.5 ng/l per substance. At that level, the quality of results depends on the whole laboratory: stable room climate, clean services, well-planned workflows and controlled materials.

A lab container can create these conditions faster than a conversion during ongoing operation. The prerequisite is a design that starts from the analytical methods rather than from square metres. Then an additional instrument becomes additional, accreditation-ready measurement capacity.

Plan your PFAS capacity

Do you need additional PFAS measurement capacity and want to know what a lab container has to deliver? Planexus works with you on room schedule, climate, services and materials and delivers the laboratory turnkey.

Request a free initial consultation

Sources: TrinkwV Annex 2, Annex 7 and section 40 (gesetze-im-internet.de); DAkkS announcement of 15 January 2026; AGES and the state of Upper Austria on the Austrian ordinance; FOEN and FSVO on the revision of the Swiss TBDV; DIN 38407-42, DIN EN 17892; site preparation documents from an LC/MS manufacturer. As of 8 October 2026.

Frequently asked questions on PFAS analysis

Which PFAS limits apply to drinking water in Germany?
Since 12 January 2026, the sum of 20 PFAS (Sum of PFAS-20) is limited to 0.0001 mg/l, i.e. 0.1 µg/l or 100 ng/l. From 12 January 2028, an additional limit of 0.00002 mg/l, i.e. 20 ng/l, applies to the sum of PFOA, PFNA, PFHxS and PFOS (Sum of PFAS-4). Both values are set out in Annex 2 of the German Drinking Water Ordinance (TrinkwV).
What limit of quantification must a laboratory achieve for PFAS in drinking water?
Under Annex 7 of the TrinkwV, the limit of quantification must not exceed 30 per cent of the parametric value. For the sum parameters this is applied to the individual substances: each one must be quantifiable down to 0.0000015 mg/l, i.e. 1.5 ng/l. The permitted measurement uncertainty is 50 per cent.
Which standards describe PFAS analysis in water?
In Germany the key standards are DIN 38407-42 for drinking, ground and surface water as well as treated wastewater, and DIN EN 17892 specifically for drinking water. Both use liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
Can a lab container house an accredited PFAS laboratory?
Yes, provided the room climate, power supply, gas supply, extract and choice of materials are designed for LC-MS/MS trace analysis. The container itself does not confer accreditation: the laboratory must agree a new measurement room or site with its accreditation body and reflect it in its quality management system.
Why are blank values so critical in PFAS analysis?
Measurements are made at a few nanograms per litre. Yet PFAS are also present in laboratory equipment and consumables, for example PTFE tubing or PTFE-lined closures. The achievable limit of quantification therefore depends directly on how low a laboratory can keep its blank values.
How quickly can additional PFAS laboratory space be created?
A custom-designed Planexus lab container is typically manufactured in 8 to 14 weeks. Design, permits, installation, instrument set-up and coordination with the accreditation body come on top. Anyone who needs additional capacity by the PFAS-4 deadline on 12 January 2028 should start planning in 2026.
Send enquiry Call